Nastran vs patran. Compare MSC PATRAN VS MSC NASTRAN based on pricing plans, features, specification, platforms, user reviews and decide which software is the best for you. The PATRAN/NASTRAN combination offers more analysis capabilities than the N4W package. The user has the option to display the results with Quick Plot, which uses default values. 25 Pre-processor. Simcenter Nastran using this comparison chart. In many situations several elements are capable of modeling the same structural effects. Hi @george_ionita52KAC According to Google, " Patran is the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), providing solid modeling, meshing, analysis setup and post-processing for multiple solvers". NASTRAN is a widely used FEA solver that performs the numerical calculations to simulate the behavior of structures and mechanical components under various conditions. You have much more possibility in Patran for material orientation and for post processing then in Hypermesh. To use MSC/PATRAN to create fill and fringe plots to determine if the analyzed part will meet a customer-defined criteria or whether the part needs to be re-designed and re-analyzed. It provides a rich set of tools to create, manage, and visualize FEA models. It is expected that the reader has basic knowledge about linear and nonlinear finite element analysis and basics of Nastran. While still editing prob5. If you missed any of the previous release MSC Patran is a pre- and post-processing software for finite element analysis (FEA). A module is a collection of FORTRAN subroutines designed to perform a specific task—processing model geometry, assembling matrices, applying constraints, solving matrix problems, calculating output quantities, conversing with the database, printing the solution, and so on. bdf file: prob4c_1. NASTRAN was designed from the beginning to consist of several modules. MSC Software Corporation assumes no liability or responsibility to any person or company for direct or indirect damages resulting from the use of any information contained herein. While NE/NASTRAN is a very strong package, it does not have all of the advanced capabilities that MSC has due to its relative newness (ie, DMAP alters, ASETS, smaller element library). Years ago, Patran was a graphical interface for Nastran. It lists the SOL number, name, supported analysis types, and references You will learn the basics for using MSC Nastran and Patran as a pre- and post-processor. more Workflow of MSC Nastran with Patran . I need you!! I've created a model in Patran and a client wants to access to it via ANSYS. MSC Nastran is the most trusted FEA Solution for the Aerospace Industry for its accuracy & precision compared to expensive physical testing. Why are there two shear components and which one should be used for shear stress calculation to be compared against material allowable shear stress?. That is the idea behind MD Nastran (MD = Multi Discipline). MSC/PATRAN users should skip to step 16. 26 NASTRAN is a solver and it is used as processor so you cannot compare Ansys and Nastran. bdf $ NASTRAN input file created by the MSC MSC/NASTRAN input file $ translator ( MSC/PATRAN Version 7. As for solver, Marc is implicit and I think you can access LS-Dyna from inside MSC through SOL700 (solution sequence 700). Patran, one of the world's most widely used pre- and post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), introduces new capabilities in version 2024. Patran and FEMAP have great free body tools. f06, search for the word: Implementing HDF5 in MSC Nastran has been an ongoing project that began with the 2016 release. Run the analysis and make the post processing in Patran. 13. MSC/PATRAN . I have used MSC/NASTRAN with FEMAP and have evaluated NE/NASTRAN with FEMAP for my previous employers. This is the “True stress. Compare MSC Nastran vs. Together, Nastran/Patran are often used in industries such as aerospace, automotive, and manufacturing to simulate the behavior of structures and components under various There are many simulation and analysis software in the market, like Ansys, when it comes to FEM and FEA. You could hand create a data deck for processing and you would get reams of paper output. However, because of the scope of this Compare MSC NASTRAN VS MSC PATRAN based on pricing plans, features, specification, platforms, user reviews and decide which software is the best for you. What’s the difference between Patran and Simcenter Nastran? Compare Patran vs. From geometry import, meshing, setup, and post-processing. ) in the MSC. PATRAN would take that output and turn it into a graphical picture or pictures. Every FEA package has its own pros and cons. Are you using Inventor Nastran? Patran? Something else? Because you asked about Patran, that makes me think you are using Patran to create the model and Inventor Nastran to run the analysis. Submit the file for analysis in MSC/NASTRAN. I work with MSC Nastran as solver on middle size shell composites model and on my experience the best way to operate is to build the mesh in Hypermesh and then give property in Patran. The move from using FEMAP to PATRAN would be a major step but for some it might be a good move as in certain industries PATRAN is certainly the market leader. Comparison of Patran vs. The latest release of MSC Nastran and Patran have the most complete library of output data blocks for HDF5 files. Use the comparison view below to compare Patran and MSC Nastran by pricing, user ratings and reviews, supported platforms, features, company information, geography, and more. MSC offers a free student version of MSC Nastran | Patran. Otherwise to get more precise results, the Fringe option is selected, and the analyst can choose MSC. 5 ) on January 15, 1998 at $ 22:07:48. Post Processing of Stress Results Objectives: To post-process stress results from MSC/NASTRAN. Produce a MSC/NASTRAN input file from a dynamic math model created in Workshop 1. When it comes to simulating stress, dynamics, or vibration of real-world, complex systems, MSC Nastran is still the best and most trusted software in the world – period. Ansys being a very user friendly software it is widely used in MSC Apex is a bit easier to use, depending on what you’re doing, but Patran has more comprehensive Nastran support. Compute nodal displacements for desired frequency domain. NASTRAN, the solver, was initially developed for NASA by MSC for internal projects. Nastran’s Grid Point Force Balance table shows the forces and moments acting on the grid point from each source (element, applied load, etc. MSC Nastran is a FEA solver used for structural analysis, including stress, vibration, and thermal analysis, commonly used in aerospace, automotive, and other engineering fields. Patran is a pre- and post-processing software used to prepare models for Nastran and visualize results. Choosing the element type Inventor Nastran has three different types of finite elements that can be applied to a model. It's often used to create models and visualize results for solvers like MSC Nastran. Basic element (and node) information At a high level – in a similar way that a CAD model represents the digital version of your part or Post Processing of Stress Results Objectives: To post-process stress results from MSC/NASTRAN. Compare Inventor Nastran vs. Learn how to get started with MSC Patran for FEA modelling, meshing, loads, solver setup, and post-processing. The RBE2's are rigid elements that connects a master node (independent) to slaves nodes (dependents) and RBE3's, however MSC Nastran contains a large library of structural elements. In this video, the very simple simulation for bracket structural analysis is done step-by-step using Patran and solved with MSC Nastran. Linear Static Analysis of a Cantilever Beam (SI Units): Create and apply a pure bending load to a hollow, rectangular For MSC/NASTRAN users only. Patran, the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), introduces new capabilities in version 2025. Nastran was the actual FEA program. Component. Explore features, pros, cons & industry applications. While MSC Nastran 2016 has new multidisciplinary analysis solutions, Patran 2016 doesn’t look to have held back, with improved support for nonlinear and fatigue analysis. This document provides a summary of the solution types (SOLs) available in MSC Nastran for performing different types of finite element analyses, including linear statics, normal modes, buckling, nonlinear statics, direct and modal transient/frequency responses, heat transfer, aeroelastic, and design optimization analyses. Patran Results shows two values for shell in-plane shear component: XY component and XY Engr. In other words, Patran is an alternative to the Inventor Nastran environment inside Inventor. Nastran is great for load path distributions and numerous loadcases. The criteria for the selection of an element may include its capabilities (for example, whether it supports anisotropic material properties), its cost (in general, the more DOF an element has, the more expensive it is), and/or its accuracy. Also, refer to Nastran Quick Reference Guide and Nastran Reference Manual – “Additional Topics” for detailed description of nonlinear static analysis Hi! I'm using Patran to post process results with Nastran, and there is something that I cannot figure out. In general Ansys has pretty good nonlinear capabilities relative to Nastran, but Abaqus I’ve heard is best for nonlinear. 1. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Patran by user reviews, pricing, features, integrations, and more to decide which software is better for you. MSC Nastran is the world's most widely used Finite Element Analysis (FEA) solver. In this case, RBE2 and RBE3. John It’s flagship pre-processing tool called MSC Patran has been under spotlight since the introduction of new equivalent tool by MSC Software (now Symphony) called MSC Apex. The discussion revolves around comparing the FEM analysis capabilities of Abaqus and Patran/Nastran. The MSC Nastran | Patran Student Edition complements the FEA Academic Bundle by enabling students to improve software proficiency and use for personal and school projects. Patran in 2026 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Each element type has its own set of pros and cons. Patran is the most widely used FEA software; MSc Patran is a pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), nearly every structural engineer is familiar with it. MSC Software adopted a similar strategy during 2008-09 by introducing a bunch of multi-disciplinary pre-processing tools such as MD Patran and later SimExpert. MSC Nastran 2016 uses Shared Memory Parallel computing for faster performance MSC has launched its 2016 versions of Nastran and Patran, promising improved performance and speed improvements, across both products. Nastran global coordinate system Modal Frequency Response Analysis Objectives: Define a frequency-varying excitation. I would test both Femap and Patran. 3 Patran is the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), providing solid modeling, meshing, analysis setup and post-processing for multiple solvers including MSC Nastran, Marc, Abaqus, LS-DYNA, ANSYS, and Pam-Crash. PATRAN is commonly used to build the FEA Compare Patran vs. This process facilitates the use of "natural" shape functions. They can also be combined to form an efficient and accurate stress analysis solution. And due to its wide adoption, collaboration and file sharing between companies and their clients is seamless; you won’t need to convert files to access their contents. 一直计划的公众号“玩转patran/nastran”总算是与大家见面了 ，开这个号一方面是对自己与patran/nastran摸爬滚打十余年的工作 I do not know what software you are using to create the analysis. you learn preparing models and investigations in the areas of linear statics, natural frequencies and linear buckling analysis to perform. This release expands Patran’s rotor dynamics capabilities, adds SuperElement support, new MSC Nastran Card support, and enhances the graphic interface. Compare Patran and MSC Apex approaches to Loads, Boundary Conditions (LBCs) and Multiple Point Constraints (MPCs). Simcenter Nastran in 2024 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. MSC training offers over a dozen MSC Nastran instructor-led training courses in a classroom and virtual environment. ” (This table also contains strains, the strains labeled NONLINEAR come from this output. Jul 30, 2024 · Hi @george_ionita52KAC According to Google, " Patran is the world's most widely used pre/post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA), providing solid modeling, meshing, analysis setup and post-processing for multiple solvers". Typically in structures work, you extract loads from Nastran and calculate stresses by hand. The Patran stress output label NONLINEAR comes from this table. Personally, I would not swap from Femap to Patran but that is another story. Patran What’s the difference between MSC Nastran and Patran? Compare MSC Nastran vs. Patran，主要进行前后处理，Patran是一款通用的前后处理工具，也看作为其他CAE软件进行前后处理。 （备注：据了解市场上有些其他公司的Nastran软件，是源自2000前后的反垄断商业诉讼而释放出来的部分代码而开发的。 ） NAS120: Linear Static and Normal Nodes Analysis Using MSC/NASTRAN and MSC/PATRAN Linear Static Analysis of a Simply-Supported Truss: Create a finite element truss with segments in tension or compression connected by smooth pins. Compare SolidWorks Simulation, Inventor Nastran, MSC Nastran & Patran to find the best FEA tool for your needs. I can't really compare Dytran, LS-Dyna and ABAQUS. However, started in 1965 by McNeal Schwedler, PATRAN and NASTRAN are the leading software tools in the aerospace industry. The concepts, methods, and examples presented in this text are for illustrative and educational purposes only, and are not intended to be exhaustive or to apply to any particular engineering problem or design. ) The nonlinear stress data is output in the element coordinate system. SET Command in a BDF file • This is how SET command looks when you get an bdf export from Patran. TLDR: the folks at Hexagon absolutely hear you on the training issue, and care a lot about making it more accessible. For the keywords HM, H3D, HV, ASCII, OPTI, OS, NASTRAN, PUNCH, OP2, OUT2, OUTPUT2, PATRAN and APATRAN, the information provided by the OUTPUT I/O Option Entry takes precedence over information provided on the older FORMAT and RESULTS I/O Option Entries. PATRAN is a powerful, general-purpose, pre- and post-processing software for Finite Element Analysis (FEA). In my opinion, MSC/NASTRAN with PATRAN is the best package. MSC Nastran in 2025 Compare Patran and MSC Nastran to understand the differences and make the best choice. 与其配套使用的是MSC. Some examples include: nonlinear results, optimization results, fatigue life and damage results and rotordynamics results. Patran using this comparison chart. NX Nastran vs MSC Nastran is one of the most frequently encountered comparisons within engineering simulation. This release expands Patran’s rotor dynamics capabilities, adds HDF5 support, MSC Nastran Card support, supports the new high-performance solver in SOL400 and enhances the graphic interface. Nov 24, 2025 · Nastran is a finite element analysis (FEA) software program widely used for stress, dynamics, and heat transfer analysis. I usually use two RB2 with a CBEAM for modeling bolt conections on CAE systems like Hypermesh. . A First Look at Patran . MSC Nastran contains a large library of structural elements. Participants explore the advantages and disadvantages of each software package, seeking a generalized comparison based on their intended applications and experiences. I want to know the differences between CBEAM and CBAR on NX Nastran. Contacts and Gaps are not part of the discussion. Compare Simcenter Nastran vs. The model has MPC (multi-point constraints) defined. A beginner-friendly guide from SIMTEQ Engineering. xxit, im2i, jd3ew, ytxz, 2dmk, 7dy5f, xntxt5, qf67z3, j05c, ejcxc,